International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Lookup arguments have become a central tool in proof systems, powering a range of practical applications. They enable the efficient enforcement of non-native operations, such as bit decomposition, range checks, comparisons, and floating-point arithmetic. They underpin zk-VMs by modelling instruction tables, provide set membership proofs in stateful computations, and strengthen extractors by ensuring witnesses belong to small domains. Despite these broad uses, existing lookup constructions vary widely in assumptions, efficiency, and composability. In this work, we systematize the design of lookup arguments and the cryptographic primitives they rely on. We introduce a unified and modular framework that covers standard, projective, indexed, vector, and decomposable lookups. We classify existing protocols by proof technique—multiset equality, Logup-based, accumulators, and subvector extraction (matrix–vector)—as well as by composition style. We survey and evaluate existing protocols along dimensions such as prover cost, dependence on table size, and compatibility with recursive proofs. From this analysis, we distill lessons and guidelines for choosing lookup constructions in practice and highlight the benefits and limitations of emerging directions in literature, such as preprocessing and decomposability.