International Association for Cryptologic Research

International Association
for Cryptologic Research


Batch Verification for Statistical Zero Knowledge Proofs

Inbar Kaslasi
Guy N. Rothblum
Ron D. Rothblum
Adam Sealfon
Prashant N. Vasudevan
Search ePrint
Search Google
Presentation: Slides
Abstract: A statistical zero-knowledge proof (SZK) for a problem $\Pi$ enables a computationally unbounded prover to convince a polynomial-time verifier that $x \in \Pi$ without revealing any additional information about $x$ to the verifier, in a strong information-theoretic sense. Suppose, however, that the prover wishes to convince the verifier that $k$ separate inputs $x_1,\dots,x_k$ all belong to $\Pi$ (without revealing anything else). A naive way of doing so is to simply run the SZK protocol separately for each input. In this work we ask whether one can do better -- that is, is efficient batch verification possible for SZK? We give a partial positive answer to this question by constructing a batch verification protocol for a natural and important subclass of SZK -- all problems $\Pi$ that have a non-interactive SZK protocol (in the common random string model). More specifically, we show that, for every such problem $\Pi$, there exists an honest-verifier SZK protocol for batch verification of $k$ instances, with communication complexity $poly(n) + k \cdot poly(\log{n},\log{k})$, where $poly$ refers to a fixed polynomial that depends only on $\Pi$ (and not on $k$). This result should be contrasted with the naive solution, which has communication complexity $k \cdot poly(n)$. Our proof leverages a new NISZK-complete problem, called Approximate Injectivity, that we find to be of independent interest. The goal in this problem is to distinguish circuits that are nearly injective, from those that are non-injective on almost all inputs.
Video from TCC 2020
  title={Batch Verification for Statistical Zero Knowledge Proofs},
  booktitle={Theory of Cryptography},
  author={Inbar Kaslasi and Guy N. Rothblum and Ron D. Rothblum and Adam Sealfon and Prashant N. Vasudevan},