IACR News
If you have a news item you wish to distribute, they should be sent to the communications secretary. See also the events database for conference announcements.
Here you can see all recent updates to the IACR webpage. These updates are also available:
04 April 2026
Keisuke Hara, Keisuke Tanaka, Masayuki Tezuka
Yin Zhu, Junqing Gong, Kai Zhang, Shay Gueron, Haifeng Qian
To address these challenges, we propose FOVA, a fast one-shot verifiable aggregation protocol that simultaneously achieves aggregation hiding and authenticity against an actively malicious server. Notably, authenticity, defined under full participation, must be relaxed for dropout robustness due to the indistinguishability between adversarial omissions and legitimate dropout. FOVA is built upon the verifiable linearly homomorphic encryption scheme, for which we give a new construction based solely on the Paillier cryptosystem. This design enables high efficiency and allows FOVA to be integrated into existing Paillier-based FL frameworks with minimal modifications. We implement FOVA on top of an industrial FL framework. Experimental results show that, compared to the most relevant prior protocols, FOVA achieves up to three orders-of-magnitude speedup while providing stronger security guarantees.
Kertis Mwanza, Carsten Köhn
Garrett Greiner, Toshi Mowery, Pratik Soni
We implement $\mathsf{HyperVerITAS}$ with two distinct commitment schemes (Brakedown and multilinear KZG) and evaluate it on full-system pipelines involving cropping and grayscaling. On commodity hardware (Apple M3, 36 GB RAM), $\mathsf{HyperVerITAS}$ generates proofs for 33 MP images using only 27 GB of RAM and 6.6 minutes of proving time, whereas $\mathsf{VerITAS}$ fails to scale beyond 4 MP. These results establish $\mathsf{HyperVerITAS}$ as a practical and scalable ZKP system for secure and efficient image provenance.
Damien Robert
Ittai Abraham, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren, Ertem Nusret Tas
First, blockchain systems require rotating leaders, but the existing constructions are not optimized for low latency under leader rotation. Second, blockchain systems require provable commitments that can be forwarded to clients or offchain entities. Third, modern blockchains optimize for low latency in the good case, and often further optimize for a fast path under even milder adversarial conditions.
In this work, we formalize and study fast paths in the context of provable synchronous BFT. Our first result is that for $n \le 2t + 2p + c -1$, it is impossible to obtain a provable synchronous BFT protocol that tolerates $t$ Byzantine and $c$ crash faults while also achieving a two round fast path resilient to $p$ Byzantine faults. Guided by this bound, we then present four provable synchronous protocols tailored to two deployment paradigms: optimistic responsivness and fixed view schedules.
For optimistic responsiveness, we present $\Delta$-Sync Simplex and $2\Delta$-Sync Simplex, which for $n = 2t + 2p + c + 1$, produce provable commit certificates in time $2\delta$ under a correct leader when the number of faulty parties $f$ satisfies $f \le p$. $2\Delta$-Sync Simplex also achieves $3\delta$ commit latency when the total number of faulty parties is $f \le \lfloor (p + t)/2 \rfloor$ with Byzantine faults $f_b \le t$ and crash faults $f_c \le c$. Outside these optimistic regimes, the protocols remain safe and live for $t$ Byzantine and $c$ crash faults, and output provable commitments within $2\Delta + 2\delta$ and $1\Delta + 3\delta$, respectively. Under faulty leaders, the protocols guarantee a worst case view length of $6\Delta + \delta$ and $5\Delta + \delta$ respectively.
For fixed view schedules, we present two additional protocols, TenderSync and SyncMint, that trade off commit latency and view duration. They achieve either $3\Delta$ provable commit with $4\Delta$ views, or $4\Delta$ provable commit with $3\Delta$ views. Both protocols obtain a provable commit in $2\delta$ under a correct leader when $f \le p$.
Jai Hyun Park, Alain Passelègue, Damien Stehlé
The construction consists in running Dilithium's signing algorithm under Threshold Fully Homomorphic Encryption (ThFHE), except for the computation of the signing challenge that happens in clear. Due to the type of operations performed, we rely on the CKKS scheme for homomorphic computations. However, a number of challenges remain, for which we develop new tools. In particular, we describe a CKKS-BFV continuum that helps for modular operations in the context of other non-arithmetic operations, a hybrid-format homomorphic comparison when the input is the sum of a bit-decomposed integer and a small integer, and a modulus-thrifty homomorphic comparison of larger non-bit-decomposed integers. Furthermore, to ensure the protocol is communication efficient, we developed a new threshold decryption method for CKKS providing more compact decryption shares.
Our proof-of-concept implementation of the FHE components of the signing protocol runs in 1.343s on an RTX-5090 GPU, with 23.6KB of communication per party for the NIST level-2 Dilithium variant. Most of it can be run in an offline phase without the message to be signed, the online cost then shrinks to~0.202s and 4.10KB per party. Apart from the two decryption steps, this computation is entirely public and can be delegated to a server with more powerful hardware.
Chenqi Lin, Yubo Cui, Zhelei Zhou, Cheng Hong, Yufei Wang, Zhaohui Chen, Meng Li
Shivarama K. N, Susil Kumar Bishoi, Vadiraja Bhatta G. R., Vashek Matyas
Gustavo Banegas, YoungBeom Kim, Seog Chung Seo, Christine van Vredendaal
Pierre Daix-Moreux, Chengru Zhang
To minimize the L2 users’ overhead for achieving privacy while enabling efficient creation of compact blocks, PlasmaBlind is built upon a novel architecture that leverages folding schemes’ powerful and flexible properties. On the user side, we utilize their blinding property to shield and prove transaction data without expensive succinct zero-knowledge proofs. On the aggregator side, their low accumulation cost allows efficient aggregation of user instances into a constant size proof of block validity.
We further improve our proof aggregation performance by proposing an optimization technique that efficiently links two different verification tasks with shared input while eliminating the need for cumbersome proof composition of non-uniform circuits, which could be of independent interest.
The practicality of PlasmaBlind is validated by our preliminary benchmarks, which demonstrate that, with consumer hardware, PlasmaBlind achieves sub-100ms proving time on the client side and sub-300ms per-transaction time on the aggregator side.
Tong Yu, Haodong Jiang, Hong Wang, Rongmao Chen, Qingfeng Cheng, Xinyi Huang, Yuefei Zhu
In this paper, we first propose a generalized sieving-ISD framework (called progressive sieving-ISD), which allows for more freedom in parameter configuration. In particular, we present a concrete complexity analysis for both our progressive sieving-ISD and its ``decoding one out of many'' (DOOM) variant under a binary sieve heuristic, whose validity can be verified via experiments. Then, by searching the optimal parameter configuration, we show that our progressive sieving-ISD can achieve attack time complexity improvements over the previous non-progressive version by 5-12 bits. In particular, for all the three categories of HQC to be standardized by NIST, we show that the state-of-the-art complexity results can be reduced by 7-9 bits using our progressive sieving-ISD, making their security levels 5.1/2.1/5.7 bits below the NIST requirements (143/207/272 bits). Interestingly, our results show that when considering the concrete security of Classic McEliece/HQC/BIKE, the progressive sieving-ISD with [GJN24, TIT]'s deterministic LSF can achieve a better performance than the ones with probabilistic LSFs in [DEEK24, EC]. Finally, we show the connection between progressive sieving-ISD and BJMM, and hence explain why progressive sieving-ISD can achieve a better time complexity than BJMM.
Dai Chi Do, Quoc Toan Nguyen, Phong Quang Trieu, Ba Danh Vu
03 April 2026
Hanoi, Vietnam, 29 October 2026
Submission deadline: 30 June 2026
Notification: 31 July 2026
Cotswold District, United Kingdom, 15 December - 16 December 2026
Submission deadline: 31 July 2026
Tokyo, Japan, 24 November - 26 November 2026
Submission deadline: 8 June 2026
Notification: 20 August 2026
Queenstown, New Zealand, 24 September - 26 September 2026
Submission deadline: 31 May 2026
Notification: 15 July 2026
Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
Xiamen University, located in Xiamen—one of China’s top ten most livable cities—is widely recognized as one of the most beautiful universities in China. It has long been regarded as one of the leading academic institutions in Southern China. With its beautiful campus, rich cultural heritage, and vibrant academic atmosphere, Xiamen University offers an outstanding environment for research and professional growth.
We are now inviting applications for a postdoctoral position in the theory and practice of symmetric-key cryptography, with an initial appointment of two years. Potential research topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Design, analysis, and implementation of high-speed AEAD schemes for 5G and 6G systems
- Design, analysis, and implementation of cryptographic hash algorithms
- Security analysis and provable security of modes of operation
Candidates with a strong publication record in established cryptography and security venues are encouraged to apply. Applicants are invited to send their CV and a motivation letter to Dr. Yaobin Shen (yaobin.shen [at] xmu.edu.cn).
Closing date for applications:
Contact: Yaobin Shen
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Closing date for applications:
Contact: Asst. Prof. Elena Pagnin
More information: https://www.chalmers.se/en/about-chalmers/work-with-us/vacancies/?rmpage=job&rmjob=14409&rmlang=UK
Remote, small post-quantum cryptography company with HQ in Texas
Closing date for applications:
Contact: Jeff Hennigan, 469-936-1742