Membership meeting Thursday June 1, 2010 (Supporting slides with additional details may be available on the IACR website.) President Bart Preneel opened the meeting at 5:30pm, giving a brief overview of the IACR, its conference/workshops, etc. He reminded the membership that three of the directors have terms expiring this year, and encouraged members to run for office. Preneel (on behalf of Treasurer Helena Handschuh) gave a report summarizing the IACR's finances. He highlighted the fact that despite the economic crisis, the IACR has a strong financial position. The IACR targets break-even on its events, and tries to keep the overhead budget below 2%. It was noted that attendence was particularly strong in 2009 despite the global financial crisis. Preneel thanked Handschuh for her continued hard work. Preneel noted a proposal to reduce the membership fee for 2012 from $88 full/$44 student to $70/35; with four abstentions and one against, the proposal passed. Preneel gave a report on the behalf of Membership secretary Shai Halevi. Overall, membership is steadily increasing. Preneel also mentioned our online services, in particular the cryptoDB service. He thanked Halevi for his hard work. General Chairs Olivier Billet and Matt Robshaw were presented with a certificate of appreciation for his excellent running of EC'10. Billet thanked the Grimaldi staff for their help. Program Chair Henri Gilbert also received a certificate for delivering an excellent technical program. Gilbert thanked the program commitee members and GCs Billet and Robshaw. Preneel then gave a list of the upcoming IACR conferences and workshops. He noted the upcoming colocation of CHES and Crypto'10. He also announced that David Pointcheval will be the program chair of EC'12. Preneel announced (again) that Matt Franklin is the new editor-in-chief of the Jounal of Cryptology. On behalf of EiC Franklin, he encouraged members to send their best work, especially in applied cryptography. Preneel gave a very brief report on behalf of Newsletter editor Christopher Wolf, highlighting the number of new ideas that Wolf has for the newsletter. He highlighted the new 'book review' portion of the newsletter. Preneel quickly reviewed the IACR Fellows process, and noted that in 2010 we have five new fellows. He thanked the fellows committee for their work. Preneel reminded the audience that we have and IACR reading room, which provides free electronic access to all past proceedings of our conferences, workshops and the journal. This service is provided by Springer. He also reminded the audience that the IACR provides an archive, and that there is currently a two-year delay between the time proceedings are published by Springer and the time that the IACR can make these available in the archive. The board is lobbying Springer to reduce this delay. He mentioned that there are other publishing models for the future, in particular the Open Access model through Springer (which costs quite a bit of money); another Open Access model is to abandon Springer and follow the model of STACS (LIPIcs) and Usenix. Regarding the journal, he noted that Springer has suggested that we institute separate pricing policy for those members who want a paper copy of the journal, and those who do not. Preneel gave a brief report on the current board activities. In particular: o He gave a summary of the board's progress (from 2008 until today) on the matter of e-voting, highlighting in particular that in 2008 the Board was given permission (by membership vote) to amend the bylaws so that they allow for e-voting. He read (and projected) a formal statement of the position of the board for approval by the membership, both at EC'10 and Crypto'10. A member asked if the board will report on the findings of the election committee after the e-voting system is tried. Preneel responded that they would. A member asked if the Helios team would be responsible for administration of the election. Halevi responded that the intention is for the Helios team to be in charge of system maintenence only. Benaloh also noted that Adida is pursuing a non-profit organization to support Helios in the future. A member asked if irregularities occur during the election, what would happen. Preneel responded that we will have a backup, even going so far as to returning to paper voting. The member followed up by asking what constitutes an irregularity. Benaloh addressed this briefly, saying that the board believes that the irregularity reporting functionality is sound; Halevi directed members to read the detailed online report. The membership voted: with three abstentions and no votes against, the membership approved the board's formal statement. o he reminded about the initiation of rolling program chairs (one junior chair, one senior chair) at the flagship conferences o he brought up the prospect of collocating or possible merging workshops with events, and asked for members to give their input to him or other board members. The floor was opened for discussion: There were no comments from the audience. The meeting was closed at 6:20pm.